Successful Branding Codes: Target First, Aesthetics Second
Why effective branding codes start with who you target — and how packaging, environments, and social context make your brand feel "right" in the real world.
Introduction
Your Branding Codes Should Match the World You Want to Live In
Most branding discussions start with how something looks: – “Should we use this color?” – “Is this logo modern enough?” – “Do we need an illustration style?”
The more useful starting question is much simpler:
Where should my brand show up — and in whose hands?
Because once you know where you want to be seen (on shelves, in feeds, in people’s kitchens, on stage at events), your branding codes stop being abstract design choices and start acting as targeted tools.
This is especially visible in snack bars and packaged foods. Their codes aren’t just about being pretty. They’re built to:
- Look good in an athlete’s hand on Instagram
- Stand out in a chaotic supermarket aisle
- Feel “premium enough” for a coworking fridge or a photo in a founder’s newsletter
Let’s unpack how this works — and where brands nail it or miss it completely.
Target First, Then Codes
Start With a Scene, Not a Logo
A useful exercise when defining branding codes:
Describe three scenes where your brand will appear.
- A morning commute with coffee and your snack bar
- An unboxing video from an influencer’s kitchen
- A conference coffee break with branded cups
Write what you want people to feel in each scene.
- “Smart and light, not guilty”
- “Playful, slightly rebellious”
- “Competent, trustworthy, not boring”
Only then design visual codes that deliver that feeling repeatedly.
In research interviews, people often can’t explain why a brand feels right. But they can point to:
- “It looks like something my favorite creator would post.”
- “Feels like a startup brand, not a supermarket brand.”
- “Looks like it belongs in a gym, not in a kids’ snack section.”
That’s a sign your codes are aligning with the target context, not just the designer’s taste.
Successful Codes: When Form Follows Usage
Example 1: RXBAR – “No B.S.” on the Wrapper
RXBAR’s famous packaging is a masterclass in target-based coding:
- Target world: CrossFit gyms, Whole Foods shelves, fitness Instagram.
- Code: Ingredients listed as a bold, centered stack of words (3 Egg Whites. 6 Almonds. 4 Cashews. 2 Dates. No B.S.)
Why it works:
- On shelves, it reads like a nutrition label turned front cover.
- In someone’s hand, the bar becomes a mini manifesto in photos.
- The “No B.S.” line became a meme and a talking point — free word-of-mouth.
Behind the scenes, researchers noticed that people remembered RXBAR not as “the blue bar,” but as “the one with the ingredient list on the front.” That’s a distinctive code built directly from how and where the bar is used.
Example 2: Oatly – Packaging As a Protest Poster
Oatly rebranded in the early 2010s with packaging that looks like a mix of:
- Zine graphics
- Protest posters
- Hand-drawn typography
Target world: Urban millennials, coffee shops, Instagram, “alt” lifestyle spaces.
Codes they leaned into:
- Messy typography that feels human and anti-corporate
- Copy that talks like a person, not a brand manual
- Strong shelf impact next to minimal dairy cartons
The interesting (and less discussed) research insight:
In early tests, some participants called the packaging “too loud” or “trying too hard” — but they still remembered it a week later, while forgetting more polished alternatives.
Oatly chose memorability over “being liked” in the first 5 seconds. Their codes were designed to live on baristas’ counters and in social media photos, not in a conservative supermarket dairy aisle.
When Codes Fail: Great Design in the Wrong World
Example 1: The Minimalist Snack Bar That Disappeared
Imagine a founder who wants their snack brand to feel “Apple-level minimal.” So they:
- Use lots of white space
- Pick a thin sans-serif font
- Add a tiny, tasteful logo
In a design presentation, it looks fantastic. In the real world:
- On a busy supermarket shelf, it disappears between louder, more colorful brands.
- In a gym vending machine, the white looks cheap (like a generic private label).
- In photos, the bar reads as blank packaging unless you zoom in.
The branding code was aesthetically strong but contextually blind. The target customer didn’t live in a Behance mockup — they lived in:
- fluorescent supermarket lighting
- scuffed vending machines
- chaotic lunchboxes
This is a common failure pattern: the brand belongs to Dribbble, not to the world it’s supposed to sell in.
Example 2: Tropicana’s 2009 Redesign – When Codes Break Familiarity
Tropicana’s infamous 2009 packaging redesign is often told as “people hate change.”
But the more interesting angle is – They removed the ** codes people used to recognize the pack in 1 second.
What changed?
- The iconic orange with a straw was replaced by a generic glass of juice.
- The logo moved and softened.
- The cap changed to look like an orange (cute, but not cognitively essential).
In aisle research, regular buyers literally walked past the new packaging because:
- It no longer fit their mental screenshot of “Tropicana in my fridge.”
- The visual search task (“find the orange with straw”) suddenly failed.
Sales reportedly dropped by ~20% in just a few weeks before PepsiCo reversed the redesign. Not because the new design was ugly — but because the brand codes no longer matched how shoppers searched and grabbed juice.
Hidden Layer: Who Is Supposed to Hold Your Brand?
One under-discussed part of branding codes:
Who is meant to be photographed with your product?
For a snack bar brand, the “target hand” might be:
- A runner’s wrist with a smart watch
- A designer’s desk with a MacBook keyboard
- A parent’s hand reaching into a lunchbox
Some brands reverse-engineer this:
- Pick colors and proportions that look good in vertical phone photos.
- Ensure the logo reads clearly when held between two fingers.
- Avoid finishes (like heavy gloss) that cause glare in quick snapshots.
In qualitative research, people often can’t articulate this. But you’ll see it in:
- The type of photos they upload with the product
- Where influencers naturally place it (gym bench vs. marble kitchen counter)
- Which backgrounds feel “wrong” for the brand
Those repeated patterns are branding codes in the wild.
Building Codes Around Your Own Target
If you’re working on your own brand, try this practical checklist:
Write three “in the wild” scenarios.
- Where exactly is someone using or showing your product? Decide what has to be readable from 1–2 meters away.
- Logo? Product benefit? Ingredient? Price? Design for the hand and the camera.
- Does it look good when held, not just when laid flat? Test in ugly environments.
- Supermarket lighting, messy desks, low-quality phone photos. Protect 2–3 codes ruthlessly.
- A layout frame, a color block, a tone of voice. Those are your assets.
Conclusion
Successful Branding Codes Are Born Where Your Product Lives
Strong branding isn’t just a beautiful logo or clever typography. It’s the repeated pattern that survives:
- Supermarket chaos
- Bad lighting
- Last-minute marketing slides
- An influencer’s slightly shaky unboxing video
When you start with who you target and where your brand appears, your codes become tools instead of decorations. Packaging, digital touchpoints, and environments begin to tell the same story.
Make it easy for your audience to recognize your brand in motion, in their hands, and in the real world — not just inside a polished mockup.
“Design for the shelf, the feed, and the hand. That’s where your branding codes really live.”
Futured Articles
Sign up for our newsletter
News, insights, case studies, and more from the rausr team — straight to your inbox.
Featured Content
Let’s Dish It Out
Send us your brief, your wildest idea, or just a hello. We’ll season it with curiosity and serve back something fresh, cooked with care.